TEC Banner

Meeting Evaluation Summary

January 20-22, 1999

Jacksonville, Florida

I. Affiliation (self-identified):

15   Member (TEC/WG Member Organization) 2   U.S. DOE Contractor
6   Participant 1   Other
10   U.S. Department of Energy  

 

II. How useful were the following presentations or sessions in providing you with ideas or information that directly addressed your needs?

A. An Introduction to TEC/WG

Response: Very Useful Somewhat Useful Not Useful Didn't Attend

# responding:

(5) (7) (2) (17)


B. Plenary Session #1--Topic Group Reports

Response: Very Useful Somewhat Useful Not Useful Didn't Attend

# responding:

(18) (15) (0) (1)


C. Plenary Session #2—Panel Discussion of TEMPER     ‘98/Portsmouth (VA) Naval Response Exercises

Response: Very Useful Somewhat Useful Not Useful Didn't Attend

# responding:

(15) (15) (3) (1)


D. Plenary Session #3—Panel Discussion:   Balancing Free Speech & Safe Transportation

Response: Very Useful Somewhat Useful Not Useful Didn't Attend

# responding:

(17) (12) (3) (2)


E.   Plenary Session #4—Panel Discussion:  Lessons Learned from Recent Navy Napalm Shipments

Response: Very Useful Somewhat Useful Not Useful Didn't Attend

# responding:

(14) (14) (0) (2)

 

F. Plenary Session #5—Summary of Breakout Sessions

Response: Very Useful Somewhat Useful Not Useful Didn't Attend

# responding:

(9) (14) (4) (5)

 

 G. Breakout Sessions

1.  General Planning

Response: Very Useful Somewhat Useful Not Useful Didn't Attend

# responding:

(20) (10) (3) (1)


2.  Emergency Management Planning & Training Assistance

Response: Very Useful Somewhat Useful Not Useful Didn't Attend

# responding:

(7) (15) (8) (3)


3.  Transportation Operations

Response: Very Useful Somewhat Useful Not Useful Didn't Attend

# responding:

(11) (18) (3) (2)

 

H. Demonstration of FAST Financial Assistance Database

Response: Very Useful Somewhat Useful Not Useful Didn't Attend

# responding:

(2) (10) (2) (20)

 

III.   What topics would you like to discuss at future TEC/WG meetings?

(sample responses)

Response # responding
Dr. Peter Sandman’s book—risk and public outrage 3
SETF Protocols process and overview in plenary session 2
Transportation aspects of accelerated cleanup 2
Discussion of public outreach process/media training 2


IV.   What session from the meeting was MOST useful to you?

(sample responses)

Response # responding
General Planning Breakout Session 8
Plenary #3:  Balancing Free Speech & Safe Transportation 8
Plenary #4:  Lessons Learned from Navy Napalm Shipments 4
Topic Group meetings 3
Transportation Operations Breakout Session 2


V.    What session from the meeting was LEAST useful to you?

(sample responses)

Response # responding
Emergency Management Planning &
Training Assistance Breakout Session
4
General Planning Breakout Session 4
Transportation Operations Breakout Session 3
Plenary Session #2:  Overview of TEMPER '98/Portsmouth (VA) Naval Response Exercises 3


VI.   Was there anything in particular that you LIKED?

(sample responses)

Response # responding
Plenary Session #4:  Lessons Learned from Navy Napalm Shipments 5
Plenary Session #3:  Balancing Free Speech & Safe Transportation 4
General Planning Breakout Session 4
Location/Meeting Facilities 3


VII.    Was there anything in particular that you DID NOT LIKE?

(sample responses)

Response # responding
General Planning Breakout Session--raised unrealistic expectations among participants; criteria not well-defined 3
Presentation on DOT Mode & Route Study--"talking head"; little opportunity for real discussion 2
Emergency Management/Transportation Operations Breakout Sessions too similar to plenary sessions 2
Not enough pre-meeting information distributed 1
Handouts wasted too much paper 1
TEC/WG losing focus 1

 

VIII. How would you rate the meeting overall?

Response: Excellent Good Average Fair Poor

# responding:

11 16 6 1 0